Business-only website forms: do not submit patient information, EOBs, claim files, credentials, or other PHI.

Healthcare Claim Exception Analysis

Turn denial and payment data into a prioritized review list instead of another unresolved report.

OriNova reviews approved denial, remit, claim-history, and reimbursement evidence to categorize issues and identify realistic follow-up candidates. The analysis distinguishes preventable denials, documentation gaps, coding-review items, payer-processing concerns, contractual outcomes, and potential reimbursement discrepancies.

Business-only discovery firstNo bank accessEvidence and scope controls

Who this service is for

  • Practices with growing denial inventory
  • Teams that track denial counts but not root causes or deadlines
  • Organizations seeing repeated payer or service-line issues
  • Billing leaders needing a prioritized evidence-based review list

What OriNova reviews

  • CARC, RARC, group codes, and payer messages
  • Eligibility, authorization, timely filing, duplicate, and documentation categories
  • Expected allowed amount and actual payment when available
  • Appeal or corrected-claim deadline evidence
  • Claim history and prior actions
  • Evidence readiness and required escalation
  • Payer, service, provider, and workflow patterns

Operational and reimbursement risks this can surface

  • Deadline-sensitive claims without owners
  • Repeated denials caused by process failure
  • Possible underpayments accepted as contractual adjustments
  • Coding or medical-necessity questions handled without qualified review
  • Denial reports that do not connect to evidence or action

What the client receives

  • Denial-category and payer-pattern summary
  • Priority follow-up candidate list
  • Potential reimbursement discrepancy log
  • Evidence and missing-information matrix
  • Root-cause observations and prevention recommendations
Important scope reminderOriNova provides analytical review, operational assessment, documentation, and reporting support. Findings do not authorize coding changes, payer submissions, claim corrections, appeals, write-offs, or guaranteed recovery. Items requiring payer-specific research, qualified coding or clinical review, legal review, or client confirmation are clearly flagged.

How the engagement works

1. Define

Define the denial population and priority questions

2. Review

Review approved remit, claim-history, deadline, and reimbursement evidence

3. Classify

Classify the issue without inventing payer rules

4. Assign

Assign priority, confidence, and required escalation

5. Deliver

Deliver a findings report and action-ready exception log

Frequently asked questions

Do you appeal denied claims?

Payer communication and appeals are outside the standard analytical scope unless separately authorized in writing.

Do you change codes or modifiers?

No. Coding and modifier changes require qualified coding review and client authority.

Do you guarantee recoverability?

No. OriNova identifies follow-up candidates and evidence requirements; payer outcomes and recovery are not guaranteed.

Need clearer denial & underpayment analysis findings?

Start with a short business-only conversation to define the question, scope, and evidence.

Request a Conversation