Sample Deliverable

A fictional, de-identified example showing how OriNova organizes findings and next steps.

Illustrative sample only: The figures below are invented and do not represent a real client, guarantee, or expected result.

Executive Findings Summary

A focused mock review of 125 claims identified 31 items requiring additional client or billing-team review. Findings included denial follow-up candidates, potential reimbursement discrepancies, posting questions, and patient-responsibility review items.

125Claims reviewed
31Items flagged
7High-priority items
4Root-cause themes

Example Findings

ReferenceFindingEvidencePriorityRecommended action
DEMO-014Potential reimbursement discrepancyAllowed amount lower than available comparison; contract confirmation required.ImportantClient billing team should verify contract terms and payer processing.
DEMO-027Authorization denial follow-up candidateAuthorization reference appears in internal notes; payer-specific validation required.UrgentConfirm authorization scope and filing deadline before appeal decision.
DEMO-042Payment posting reviewEOB reflects payment, while mock billing status remains open.ImportantCompare remittance, posting, adjustment, and account balance.
DEMO-063Patient responsibility reviewDeductible assignment appears to have been written off in the mock ledger.MonitorVerify patient ledger and write-off reason.

30-Day Action Plan

  • Review urgent authorization and timely-filing items first.
  • Validate expected reimbursement sources before pursuing underpayment concerns.
  • Compare paid EOBs with open-account and posting status.
  • Track repeated payer and root-cause patterns for operational correction.
Scope reminder: OriNova provides analytical findings and operational recommendations. The client remains responsible for coding decisions, payer communication, claim submission, legal decisions, clinical documentation, and recovery actions unless separately agreed in writing.