ServicesHow We WorkCalculatorSample ReportFAQHIPAA & Data SecurityRequest a Process Review
Illustrative sample

See what a decision-ready findings package can look like.

This fictional example demonstrates the structure and clarity of an OriNova deliverable. It contains no real client, claim, or patient information.

OriNova Group
ORINOVA GROUPHealthcare Operations & Revenue Cycle Support
ILLUSTRATIVE SAMPLENot based on a real client engagement
REVENUE CYCLE BACKLOG REVIEW

Executive Findings Package

Prepared for: Sample Healthcare Organization

Review period: Illustrative 90-day backlog

Request a Process Review
Executive summary

What the sample review indicates

The fictional backlog reflects several operational patterns that could contribute to delayed resolution, repeated work, and limited management visibility. The highest-priority opportunities involve documentation readiness, unexplained posting differences, and aging work without clear ownership.

This report does not classify gross claim value as lost or recoverable revenue. Final resolution and financial impact would require validation and action by the client’s authorized coding, billing, posting, and payer-follow-up teams.

Records reviewed1,240Illustrative backlog population
Gross claim value represented$186,400Not estimated recovery
High-priority records214Based on sample criteria
Aging beyond 90 days17.3%Of reviewed records
Review scope

What was evaluated

Backlog aging and statusAvailable remit and posting detailsDenial-category patternsDocumentation readinessOwnership and next-action visibilityDeadline and priority indicators
Priority findings

Issues requiring client review

Priority & issueObservation and evidenceRecommended client action
HighDocumentation gap

Supporting documentation was not consistently available for a concentrated group of unresolved records approaching internal follow-up deadlines.

Evidence: 148 records shared the same missing-documentation indicator.

Validate the documentation source, assign an owner, and prioritize records by deadline and gross claim value.

HighPayment-posting variance

Remittance details and recorded payment activity did not align consistently within the reviewed sample.

Evidence: 66 records contained an unexplained payment or adjustment difference.

Route the variance list to the authorized posting team for record-level validation and correction decisions.

MediumRecurring denial pattern

A repeated denial category appeared across multiple service periods and had no consistently documented resolution path.

Evidence: 92 records reflected the same denial family across three review periods.

Confirm root cause with the billing team, document the approved response, and add a repeat-denial monitoring view.

MediumUnclear backlog ownership

Work queues contained aging items without a visible owner, last-action date, or next step.

Evidence: 31% of reviewed unresolved records lacked one or more ownership fields.

Add owner, status, last-action, and next-review fields to the backlog control process.

Recommended next steps

A practical 30-day action plan

  1. Confirm ownership.Assign accountable owners for documentation, posting validation, denial review, and backlog control.
  2. Validate the high-priority list.Have authorized teams review supporting records and determine the appropriate record-level action.
  3. Document repeatable responses.Create an approved workflow for recurring denial and documentation categories.
  4. Establish weekly visibility.Track aging, priority, owner, last action, next action, and resolved volume in a consistent management view.
Important sample limitation

All organizations, figures, categories, and observations in this document are fictional and provided only to demonstrate report structure. This sample is not an audit, legal opinion, coding determination, reimbursement guarantee, or estimate of recoverable revenue.